| Deviant Login | Shop |
 | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
| Digital Art / Vexel / People | ©2009-2012 ~artemisa-69 |
S T O C K 
C O M M E N T S & C R I T I Q U E S please!!!! 
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `TimberClipse's dedication to our community is without question. From developing helpful tutorials, to being a community leader in groups such as #fella and #deviant365, you can always find Zev connecting with all areas of our community in order to spread his infectious enthusiasm and inspiring positivity. We are delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2012 to `TimberClipse, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
--
screw love i want a cookie!!!!!! D:<
--
Per aspera ad astra
--
Per aspera ad astra
I mean, that;s irrelevant, but it ain't a vexel unless it's not scalable as they sd.
Vector are pure.
And this is beautiful!
S
--
s ♥ s
I've kept the original AI file, so it's still a pure vector.
I don't care, the contest passed anyway...
Thank you sweetie! And thank you for the +fav!
--
Per aspera ad astra
Kinda...
This is how I see it.
If I do a drawing in Illustrator so vector stuff, then I bring the file in PS and turn it into a jpeg, which rasterizes all the layers, well, that's still a vector work!
Cause it has just been turned into vexel or pure pixel actually for conveniency...
On the other hand, let's say you do a vector, then you want to add some textures on top of some objects let's say...
so:
1. You import your vector in PS, then add layers of texturing, this is vexel. You cannot make it bigger.
The ps layers would get blurry.
2. You keep your file in illustrator, you import your textures in Illustrator, you place them, this is still vexel.
Cause, this textures are jpeg, cannot make them bigger either... That's of course, what they mean by not scalable. That's bs, cause you can make them smaller, but not bigger. It is scalable, but only one way.
3. You keep your file in illustrator, every single texture you import, you go into the live trace and turn them all into vectors.
This is a killer for the computer. You use your vectored texture the same way you would use the jpeg one.
it is scalable, fully, scalable, it is vector.
I think I got it right, he he he...
But in the end, it is lame.
Cause what matters, is the art.
And yours is amazing...
Again, I really like the very thick blue line, so... I don't know... So well balanced and attractive...
Sorry for the rant...
S
--
s ♥ s
If you ask me, I think that's bullshit... I hate categorizing art, and vector or vexel are the MEDIA, not the STYLE, so what's the point of that fighting? Just do art!
--
Per aspera ad astra
A % what a pile of crap!
Sounds so french and mental masturbation!
This is about Art
And I disagree anyway.
Cause, in the example you gave, if the drop shadows are made using FILTERS in Illustrator, it become a vexel.
Not scalable.
Don't care about the %.
Cannot make it bigger period!
If the shadows are made using EFFECTS, it is vector, as still using algorithms in the making of the shades, so still scalable.
But that's such a pile of crap!
It is important to define a medium, but it is majorly more important to use it.
Many many critiques seems to be pretty poor artists themselves and rarely producing a lot....
I find that interesting.
An artist needs support.
An artist needs critiques, this is only a matter of facts, and critiques are to define what doesn't work in a piece and WHAT WORKS!!!!!
Bla bla bla....
Sorry for the rant dear!
--
s ♥ s
I just try not to participate in such discussions because
a) they always lead to nowhere
b) I don't care about categorizing
c) I rather spend that time making art
--
Per aspera ad astra